![]() ![]() The easiest way to do this is to create a dummy surface just before the NSS. There’s nothing wrong with sequential thinking, in its proper place, it’s a very powerful way to think, but it’s not the best way to think for every kind of process. Remove the Aperture Stop surface from within the non-sequential surface (NSS) group. I think the symmetry in your system may be beneficial that this can work. Non-Sequential One counter-intuitive aspect of disciple making movements and simple churches is that the process is non sequential. We can set this rectangular detector far from the lens, and optimize for maximum flux (or intensity). Let's say the height of the rectangle is equal to the range from 89 to 91 degrees. For example, although the cylindrical object set to a detector may not work here, you can make a very slim and long rectangular object and set it far away from your source. My advice would be close to your own suggestion, use a different detector but try to shape it so that the range is very small. I think something similar is needed here. In my previous experience, I sometimes used small tiles and tiles of detector rectangles in the shape of a pseudo-hemisphere because I needed the resulting data in a specific format. We end up with many empty pixels that don't provide any function. My experience has been that using a large area detector for a specific target, in this case, a specific angle of 90 degrees, may not work well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |